AI Prompt-A-Thon 2024 Hackathon Rules

General Participation Rules:

  1. Eligibility:

    • The hackathon is open to students, professionals, and AI enthusiasts of all skill levels.
    • Participants may compete in one of three categories: Institution, Team, or Individual.
    • Participants must register via the official event platform and submit their projects through Devpost before the deadline.
  2. Team Formation:

    • Teams may consist of up to 5 members.
    • Each participant can only join one team.
    • Participants may choose to compete individually (under the Individual category) or as part of a team (under the Team or Institution categories).
  3. Tracks & Categories:

    • Institutions must choose from either Track 2 (AI-to-Video Production) or Track 3 (AI Chatbot Assistant Development).
    • Teams may choose from either Track 1 (Text-to-Image Creation) or Track 2 (AI-to-Video Production).
    • Individuals may compete only in Track 1 (Text-to-Image Creation).

Submission Rules:

  1. Devpost Submission:

    • All projects must be submitted via Devpost by the specified deadline. Late submissions will not be accepted.
    • Each submission must include all the required components, such as the project title, description, AI prompts, and any relevant media (videos, images, or chatbot demos).
  2. Track-Specific Rules:

    • Text-to-Image Creation: Participants must submit AI-generated images and explain the prompts used to generate them.
    • AI-to-Video Production: Submit a video showcasing AI-driven or AI-enhanced content that addresses an Urban Health challenge.
    • AI Chatbot Assistant Development: Provide a working demo or link to the chatbot along with technical documentation and use cases.
  3. Original Work:

    • All submissions must be the original work of the participant(s) created during the hackathon period. Pre-existing work or code may only be used if it is open-source and properly credited.
    • Plagiarism, including the uncredited use of AI-generated or third-party assets, is strictly prohibited and will result in disqualification.
  4. Single Submission:

    • Each team or individual is allowed to submit one project per the category and track they are competing in. Multiple submissions will not be accepted.

AI Prompt-A-Thon Judging Rules and Scoring Criteria 

Overview 

The judging process for the AI Prompt-A-Thon will follow a double-blind review, where both AI and human judges will evaluate submissions independently. To ensure fairness, submissions will be anonymized, and judges will not know the identities of the participants. A combined score from AI judges and human judges will determine the winners. Participants must rank in the top tier for both categories to win. 

Categories for Judging 
  • Institution Awards (Non-Profit Projects) 
  • Team Awards 
  • Individual Awards 

Judging Rules:

  1. Double-Blind Review:

    • Both AI and human judges will review each submission without knowing the identity of the participants.
    • Judges will evaluate the submissions based on predefined criteria and assign scores independently.
    • AI will analyze aspects like prompt efficiency, creativity, and adherence to the challenge guidelines.
    • Human judges will focus on overall impact, innovation, and practical applications.
  2. Combined Scoring:

    • Each submission will receive a score from the AI and a score from the human judges.
    • To be eligible to win, submissions must be ranked highly by both AI and human judges.
  3.  Transparency & Fairness:

    • No judge will have access to participant information.
    • All results will be reviewed to ensure fairness and eliminate any potential bias.

 

Scoring Criteria per Category

1. Institution Awards (Non-Profit Projects) 

Focus: Solving Urban Health challenges through innovative AI-driven projects for the public good.

 

Criteria 

Weight 

Description 

Impact on Urban Health 

30% 

How effectively the solution addresses a critical Urban Health issue (e.g., healthcare access, public health, or environmental impact). 

Innovation 

25% 

Originality of the approach in using AI to create solutions. 

Feasibility 

20% 

The practicality of implementing the solution in real-world settings, including its scalability and sustainability.  

Technical Execution 

15% 

How well the submission leverages AI tools and prompt design to deliver results. 

Ethical Considerations 

10% 

Adherence to ethical standards in AI development, especially in healthcare-related solutions (e.g., patient privacy, bias reduction). 

2. Team Awards 

 

Focus: Collaborative efforts in solving AI challenges. 

 

Criteria  

Weight  

Description  

Team Collaboration  

25%  

How well the team worked together to leverage their collective skills to create an AI solution.  

Prompt Design Creativity  

20%  

The level of creativity shown in designing AI prompts that guide models to generate effective results.  

Solution Relevance  

20%  

The solution's relevance to the specific health challenge presented.  

Technical Execution  

20%  

Effective use of AI tools and models, technical complexity, and problem-solving.  

Impact  

15%  

The expected benefit or impact of the solution on the challenge, particularly in healthcare or urban health contexts.

 

3. Individual Awards 

Focus: Individual excellence in AI prompt design and healthcare innovation. 

 

Criteria 

Weight 

Description 

Prompt Effectiveness 

30% 

How well the prompts created by the individual guide the AI to produce accurate, relevant, and impactful outputs. 

Creativity 

25% 

Originality in the prompt design and problem-solving approach. 

Understanding of AI Tools 

20% 

Demonstrated understanding of AI capabilities and limitations when designing prompts. 

Clarity and Specificity 

15% 

How clear and specific the prompts are in guiding AI models, ensuring unambiguous and accurate responses. 

Ethical Compliance 

10% 

Consideration for ethical use of AI, particularly in healthcare-related tasks.

 

 

JUDGING PROCESS

      Submission Anonymization: 

  • All submissions will be anonymized to remove any identifying information.

Human Judge Review: 

  • A panel of expert judges will evaluate the submissions based on criteria such as innovation, impact, and technical execution. 
  • Human judges will also assign a score out of 100 for each submission. 

Score Aggregation: 

  • The final score will be an aggregate of both the AI and human judges’ scores. 
  • A submission must rank highly in both categories to be eligible for an award. 

Final Selection: 

  • Winners will be selected based on the combined scores, ensuring they performed well in both AI and human judging. 

Hackathon Conduct Rules:

  1. Code of Conduct:

    • All participants must adhere to the AI Prompt-A-Thon 2024 Code of Conduct. This includes behaving respectfully toward all participants, organizers, and judges.
    • Harassment, discrimination, or inappropriate behavior of any kind will not be tolerated and may result in disqualification and removal from the event.
  2. Collaboration & Fair Play:

    • Collaboration within teams is encouraged, but teams must work independently of other teams. Sharing code, ideas, or solutions between teams is not allowed.
    • Participants must not sabotage or interfere with the work of others.
  3. AI Tool Usage:

    • Participants are free to use any AI models or tools available to them, provided that they comply with open-source licenses and other intellectual property laws.
    • Any third-party assets used in submissions (e.g., images, datasets) must be credited appropriately.